Excuse the meat-related analogy, but when you listen to a song on streaming services or elsewhere, it’s important to remember that you did not see how the sausage was made. You are not hearing the songwriter’s multiple poorly recorded voice notes or all the wonky demos that did not make the cut.
More often than not, this is the pristine, glamour version that has been honed and re-recorded several times, featuring comped vocals. It also benefits from the skills of an engineer using expensive plugins or outboard gear to massage the tracks and the output, as well as the work of a mastering engineer who has sprinkled the mixdown with his own brand of musical MSG.
Using this method, an average song can sound pretty good. But you are not aiming for average in the long run (although don’t be afraid to write average songs on your search for the good stuff).
The lesson is: don’t try to sound shiny at the writing stage. Concentrate purely on the quality of the arrangement, lyrics, melody, texture, feel, emotion, etc. Knock the song into shape without worrying about how it will sound on Spotify. Song first, production later.
Eventually, you will play your shiny master to someone, and they will have no knowledge of the toil that went on behind the scenes. But you will.
So far, my feeling about AI is that, beyond its usefulness as a search engine, it’s only helpful for the last one percent of most creative work.
Let’s say you’ve written your lyrics (or article, or speech etc.). All the ideas, research, content, and phrasing come from your own brain. Then, you feed it into an AI tool of your choice, and it corrects your grammar or highlights awkward logic and inconsistencies.
AI is amazing at this final stage. It can catch and polish things like only a robot can.
But in my opinion (so far), the “artificial” nature of its “intelligence” becomes very evident when trying to create art.
A little experiment to demonstrate
I once wrote a song called Utopia that ended up on my last album Healer. You can listen to it here:
I started the song while living in southern China, in a factory town called Humen. Most of the inhabitants were migrant factory workers. It was an atmospheric place with a lot of history, but the pollution from the surrounding factories was chronic, and the workers didn’t look happy to me. This inspired the feel of the song and the lyrics.
I wanted to paint a picture of people trying to— or pretending to—be happy (“this is our Utopia“) while living in a pretty soul-destroying environment.
The final lyrics took a long time to write and included references to this art exhibition: Whose Utopia?. I also mention a burning motorcycle I saw in the middle of an intersection during a morning run. The coda at the end references laughing gas canisters strewn across a park in an affluent part of Manchester, where I stayed during COVID.
Here are the full lyrics:
Utopia
Oh what a pretty skyline
Fog and pollution
People lining up for execution
Silent ballerina
Dances through a factory
Lighting up the workers and machinery
This is our Utopia
This is our Utopia
Don’t shatter the illusion
This ignorance is opium
Oh how can the morning
Sky look suicidal
High above a burning motorcycle
And lonely out-of-towners
Carrion for vultures
Biting on the hand that never feeds us
This is our Utopia
This is our Utopia
Don’t shatter the illusion
‘Cause this ignorance is opium
Don’t shatter the illusion
‘Cause this ignorance is opium
There’s laughing gas
On the summer grass
This is our Utopia
The question is: Could AI have written these lyrics or something that I consider of similar quality?
Let’s see:
Here’s the result:
Utopia (Chat GPT version)
Neon hum on the factory floor, midnight shifts and metal doors. Machines sing their static tune, under an artificial moon.
And the faces glow in flickering light, dreams wrapped up in cellophane tight. Is this paradise? Is this a dream? Or just a town caught in the machine?
Utopia—painted in smoke and steel, we laugh like ghosts so the world won’t feel. We chase the sun that never sets, inside a dream we can’t forget.
Plastic gardens, concrete skies, we build the world with tired eyes. One more stitch, one more spark, one more light against the dark.
And the radio plays a hollow tune, echoes bounce in an empty room. Is this paradise? Is this a dream? Or just a town caught in the machine?
Utopia—painted in smoke and steel, we laugh like ghosts so the world won’t feel. We chase the sun that never sets, inside a dream we can’t forget.
Outside the walls, the stars still burn, but we’re too tired to lift our heads and turn. So we dance in circuits, loop and rewind, finding joy in the factory grind.
Neon hum on the factory floor, midnight shifts and metal doors. Maybe someday we’ll break free, or maybe this is all we need.
Well, they aren’t exactly terrible.
But of course, it’s the melding of the lyrics with the melody and chords that makes the song.
I played with Utopia’s chords—particularly the chorus—for years before I got it right.
But let’s see what AI comes up with. This is the version created solely with AI using Suno.com. It uses the Chat GPT lyrics above:
And this is the version also with Suno.com that uses my lyrics:
I think the results speak for themselves, but that’s just my opinion.
Finally, what about album artwork?
This song was originally going to be on my previous album, Underground Man. My artist friend Johnnie created the album artwork.
The “prompt” I gave him was:
A psychedelic scene based on the Shanghai skyline, with pollution oozing into the river in unusual colours.
And this is what he sent me:
Which became this:
But what will AI come up with?
This time let’s ask Copilot for help using the same prompt:
It’s pretty cool. But very AI.
So what do you think? Should I have used AI to create my music and artwork?
My most-streamed composition so far was written in the Nicaraguan mountains. In 2018, I lived in a town called Diriamba. We stayed on the second floor of a large house in town. The weather was sultry, and the noise of funeral processions, bar fights, farmers on horseback, and the crowing of a giant mechanical cockerel—an evil mascot for a chicken restaurant, blaring even at 5 a.m.—poured into the room.
I wrote two pieces there: Olvidar, which started on electric guitar, and a long ambient piece designed to help my wife sleep, which eventually became Silent Vapour Trail. Both tracks appear on one of my “travel” albums, Connections.
Now, Silent Vapour Trail has only had a modest number of listens across platforms, but I once uploaded it to SoundCloud under the name Relaxing Music to Help You Fall Asleep. It’s now had over 4,000 listens—which is a lot for the non–Justin Biebers of the world, like myself.
That must be down to the name—it promises something useful. But the thing is, the music does help my wife and me sleep. Life was stressful before we arrived in Nicaragua, so I deliberately wrote a long, meditative piece to help us (and anyone else) chill out.
Still, it makes me wonder—what if all my songs had titles that promised something? Love Song to Make You Feel Romantic, Upbeat Tune to Get You on the Dance Floor, Thoughtful Folk Song…
Maybe that would help listeners who don’t know or care about my music. But it wouldn’t feel honest. I called it Silent Vapour Trail because it sounded poetic, it suited my mood at the time, and I could see airplanes drifting across the pink Nicaraguan evening sky as I wrote it.
Then again, maybe none of that matters. Somewhere out there, a tired soul has drifted off to sleep listening to whatever this piece is called, blissfully unaware of the song’s origin—or its writer.
I watched the movie without knowing this. The slightly jumpy, erratic nature of some scenes only made it feel more human. The tension was palpable.
Afterward, I remembered an old boss of mine telling me, “One day, everyone will have a camera built into their phone.” That was nearly 30 years ago.
What was once impossibly expensive is now relatively affordable.
The same is true for recording equipment. I’ve often felt a little envious of writers, painters, and photographers, who can create professional work with minimal gear and cost. Meanwhile, musicians traditionally needed expensive studio setups just to showcase their work properly.
Do You Really Need a Studio in 2025?
There’s no doubt that high-end gear in the hands of skilled engineers produces superior recordings. But is it absolutely necessary?
If an experienced sound engineer were given a decent audio interface, a solid microphone, and a laptop running Logic Pro, could they produce a recording that sounds truly professional? Would their peers be able to tell if it was made in a high-end studio or in a bedroom?
Would it be the audio equivalent of Inheritance—a compelling work with only subtle hints that it was made outside a traditional production environment?
And does anyone even care about HiFi vs. LoFi anymore?
But how “Lo” Can You Go?
Ultimately, Inheritance works because its foundation is strong—the story, the acting, and the creative shot choices. Post-production undoubtedly gave it the final polish, but great source material always wins. Even Spielberg agrees.
The same applies to music. A great song and a DAW alone won’t guarantee a great recording. You need to refine your recording and mixing skills. You need to capture the moment. And you need to invest in post-production.
That might mean hiring a professional mixing or mastering engineer. But a high-quality mastering plugin used correctly can also work wonders.
Mastering on a Budget
I’m a big fan of Ozone iZotope—it’s basically AI for your mixes. Used carefully, it can elevate your tracks in ways that were once only possible with professional mastering.
A few things I’ve learned using it:
Don’t push too hot of a signal—watch that output meter.
The Master Assistant can instantly fix your EQ, or at least mix tweaks you hadn’t noticed.
It maximizes your volume for streaming without crushing dynamics.
The stereo width tool, when used sparingly, adds depth without making your mix sound artificial.
Technology Is a Gift—But It’s Not a Replacement
These advancements are a massive win for independent musicians. No doubt, incredible albums will be made in bedrooms. But at the end of the day, technology will never replace great songwriting and performance.